A pilot programme initiated by the Action for Singapore Dogs (ASD) and Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) had helped 10 stray dogs find homes in Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats by mid October.
The programme, which started in April, requires dog owners to adhere to a strict set of guidelines drawn up by the Ministry of National Development and animal welfare groups. This is to prevent friction between residents that could arise from disturbances caused by household pets.
Some guidelines include:
* Proper screening and counseling for potential adopters
* Compliance with dog ownership regulations
* Maintenance of a proper list of all adopters
* Only stray dogs of up to medium size can be re-homed
* Signing of a declaration to adhere to codes of conduct
* Imposition of adoption fees
Medium sized strays of 15kg and below which are deemed to have an appropriate temperament for apartment living are accepted in this pilot scheme. This is a move away from current HDB regulations, which stipulate that only small or toy breeds not exceeding 40cm in height can be owned by flat-dwellers.
Non-compliance with the guidelines will result in the dog being returned to the animal welfare groups.
The proposal to rehouse stray dogs was submitted to an inter-agency task force formed in July last year. ASD and SPCA ensure that all 'Singapore Specials' - referring to local breeds - would be properly vaccinated, sterilized and micro-chipped before adoption.
Apart from the re-homing of stray dogs, then Minister of State for National Development Tan Chuan-Jin announced in November last year that stray cats will also be allowed in HDB flats to reduce the issue of strays on the streets.
I have been Friends of the Singapore Zoo for many years, if you want it to continue giving us the fun and joy of animals, please visit the Singapore Zoo. Singapore Zoo, 80 Mandai Lake Road (Bus 138 from Ang Mo Kio MRT or 171 from City). Opening hours are 8.30am-6.00pm daily and adult admission is S$28, children is $18. *Park Hooper packages are more worth it. Check them out first before you purchase those tickets. Zoo, Night Safari, Jurong Bird Park or River Safari.
Showing posts with label Wild Dogs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wild Dogs. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Monday, November 05, 2012
Wild Dogs killed boy in Zoo
Toddler Killed by Wild Dogs At Pittsburgh Zoo Exhibit Should Make Us Question Zoos
A toddler boy visiting the Pittsburgh zoo somehow managed to fall into the wild dog exhibit and be ripped to shreds while his helpless mother watched from above. The horrific tragedy happened on Sunday and within minutes the story was everywhere with many questioning exactly how the little boy fell into the exhibit in the first place.
It's a good question. Wild "painted" African dogs are about the size of Labrador retrievers, weight about 37 to 80 pounds and are most dangerous in a pack. In this case, 11 dogs attacked the boy, though it is unclear whether he died from the fall or from the attack as yet.
One thing is clear: None of this should have been possible. A woman trying to "give her child a better view" should not have been able to drop him into the exhibit.
Of course, there are questions. Why did the mother not jump in after him? Understandably it happened in a matter of a seconds and the dogs were on him immediately. But imagining myself in that scenario, I can't imagine I would not make the (probably stupid) choice to jump right in and beat off the dogs.
Or maybe not.
Obviously, I can't judge the mom. I don't have any understanding of what that must have been like for her. What I can judge, though, is the zoo. For many reasons.
First of all, zoos are generally just controversial. The last dog -- a species considered endangered -- was shot because of this incident. It's not really the dog's fault. He was not a domesticated dog. He was a wild African beast who should probably be roaming in his native land, not on display for a toddler to be eaten.
Even more to the point, why was a mother able to drop her child into the exhibit? I have been to a thousand zoos from San Diego to Cincinnati and around the world and never once do I remember seeing an exhibit where it was possible to "accidentally" fall into a cage. Sure, someone who WANTED to scale a fence could do so. Stupid people do that regularly. But on "accident"? That just seems wrong.
Maybe we was wiggling. Maybe the mom was holding him in a bad way. Maybe she should not have been holding him in the way she was at all. But really, he should not have been able to fall into the exhibit. Until it is clear how this happened, I will place blame on the zoo.
The poor grieving mom, who screamed for help so loudly she was heard all over the park, is not the first person I would blame. This story is everything that is wrong with zoos.
Painted dogs are not an "exhibit." They are wild animals capable of great destruction. As parents, we trust the zoos to know that and keep us safe. How did this happen? It is unimaginable and my heart breaks for that poor mom.
A toddler boy visiting the Pittsburgh zoo somehow managed to fall into the wild dog exhibit and be ripped to shreds while his helpless mother watched from above. The horrific tragedy happened on Sunday and within minutes the story was everywhere with many questioning exactly how the little boy fell into the exhibit in the first place.
It's a good question. Wild "painted" African dogs are about the size of Labrador retrievers, weight about 37 to 80 pounds and are most dangerous in a pack. In this case, 11 dogs attacked the boy, though it is unclear whether he died from the fall or from the attack as yet.
One thing is clear: None of this should have been possible. A woman trying to "give her child a better view" should not have been able to drop him into the exhibit.
Of course, there are questions. Why did the mother not jump in after him? Understandably it happened in a matter of a seconds and the dogs were on him immediately. But imagining myself in that scenario, I can't imagine I would not make the (probably stupid) choice to jump right in and beat off the dogs.
Or maybe not.
Obviously, I can't judge the mom. I don't have any understanding of what that must have been like for her. What I can judge, though, is the zoo. For many reasons.
First of all, zoos are generally just controversial. The last dog -- a species considered endangered -- was shot because of this incident. It's not really the dog's fault. He was not a domesticated dog. He was a wild African beast who should probably be roaming in his native land, not on display for a toddler to be eaten.
Even more to the point, why was a mother able to drop her child into the exhibit? I have been to a thousand zoos from San Diego to Cincinnati and around the world and never once do I remember seeing an exhibit where it was possible to "accidentally" fall into a cage. Sure, someone who WANTED to scale a fence could do so. Stupid people do that regularly. But on "accident"? That just seems wrong.
Maybe we was wiggling. Maybe the mom was holding him in a bad way. Maybe she should not have been holding him in the way she was at all. But really, he should not have been able to fall into the exhibit. Until it is clear how this happened, I will place blame on the zoo.
The poor grieving mom, who screamed for help so loudly she was heard all over the park, is not the first person I would blame. This story is everything that is wrong with zoos.
Painted dogs are not an "exhibit." They are wild animals capable of great destruction. As parents, we trust the zoos to know that and keep us safe. How did this happen? It is unimaginable and my heart breaks for that poor mom.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
